By Sandy Nachlinger
A while back I purchased Of Human Bondage by W. Somerset
Maugham for my Kindle. It’s a great story, written 100 years ago but with
universal themes that have stood the test of time. But as I was reading, I
couldn’t help but notice all the modern “rules” that the author had broken. Writing sure has changed over the years!
Here are some examples.
Modern Rule: Don’t open your story with the weather.
Maugham: The day
broke gray and dull. The clouds hung heavily, and there was a rawness in the
air that suggested snow.
My comment: I think this rule came about in response to the cliché: “It
was a dark and stormy night.”
Modern Rule: Use “said” in dialogue and avoid other verbs,
such as injected, cajoled, implored, etc.
Maugham: “Oh, don’t take him away yet,” she moaned.
My comment: Stephen King advocates the use of “said” and
avoidance of other verbs. I’ll admit it’s distracting when characters expound,
wheedle, extol, aver, bellow, and so on.
Modern Rule: Don’t use adverbs that end in LY, especially in
dialogue.
Maugham: (All of these quotes are from one scene)
"Well, we're not in America," said Philip frigidly.
"You don't know him," said Philip hotly.
"You do talk rot," he said crossly.
"Well, we're not in America," said Philip frigidly.
"You don't know him," said Philip hotly.
"You do talk rot," he said crossly.
My comment: This is another Stephen King “no-no.” Even Mark Twain said, "If you see an adverb, kill it."
Modern Rule: Avoid long, run-on sentences.
Maugham: It looked as though Saturday were naturally
indicated for Philip, but Mary Ann said she couldn’t keep the fire up on
Saturday night: what with all the cooking on Sunday, having to make pastry and
she didn’t know what all, she did not feel up to giving the boy his bath on
Saturday night; and it was quite clear that he could not bath [sic] himself.
My comment: We do need to let the reader breathe, don’t we?
Modern Rule: Include lots of white space.
Maugham: (I’ll do everyone a favor and just say that one
paragraph in particular spanned more than four screens on my Kindle.)
In spite of all this flagrant rule breaking, Maugham’s story
was enjoyable. I can’t help but wonder, however, what future generations will
consider good writing.
Sandy, good post. My husband and I and daughters and I have talked about this very thing. For instance, we wonder if some books that are classics would be published if submitted to an editor today. I enjoy books that set the stage with description, but most readers (or so I hear) want to leap into action immediately.
ReplyDeleteVery interesting post, Sandy. I think we have too many rules these days. An adverb here and there is fine, I insist. I don't mind more description, even appreciate it. I grew up reading the classics. Sigh. My father was an English prof and I raided his bookshelves. I'm not saying some of the changes we've made aren't good because these older stories can get too wordy. But we are going too far in the other direction now. If I get one more rule to abide by I am gonna be too stifled to write.
ReplyDeleteI reread "Exodus" by Leon Uris a year or so ago and discovered a lot of things he'd done that wouldn't get by editors today. He frequently changed POV, threw in tons of back story at the beginning, and had numerous flashbacks. Even the great Agatha Christie did those things, and I have to admit, I found reading both authors tedious today. I imagine some reader will find our books years from now to be breaking new rules.
ReplyDeleteI reread "Exodus" by Leon Uris a year or so ago and discovered a lot of things he'd done that wouldn't get by editors today. He frequently changed POV, threw in tons of back story at the beginning, and had numerous flashbacks. Even the great Agatha Christie did those things, and I have to admit, I found reading both authors tedious today. I imagine some reader will find our books years from now to be breaking new rules.
ReplyDeleteJust like other pop culture elements, writing also changes with the times. Good post, Sandy.
ReplyDelete